SourceTree vs GitHub Desktop 00

The key difference between SourceTree and GitHub Desktop is that SourceTree aims at advanced workflows and multiple hosting providers while GitHub Desktop favors a simplified Git experience for GitHub users.

Overview

SourceTree presents a detailed commit graph and many options for branch and stash management. GitHub Desktop offers a cleaner surface with fewer controls so everyday tasks finish faster.

Feature snapshot

1. Platform support SourceTree runs on Mac and Windows and works with several remote hosts. GitHub Desktop runs on Mac and Windows and integrates tightly with GitHub services.
2. Workflow tools SourceTree shows history and offers fine staged changes for partial commits. GitHub Desktop focuses on common workflows to avoid overwhelming newcomers.
3. Learning curve SourceTree has more menus and options which rewards time spent learning. GitHub Desktop gets users pushing code without a deep Git lesson.
4. Advanced operations SourceTree exposes rebase and patch handling for power users. GitHub Desktop handles merges and basic conflict resolution without extra complexity.

Which to choose

Pick SourceTree when developers need fine grained control across multiple hosts and detailed visualization. Pick GitHub Desktop when the main goal is fast commits and clear integration with GitHub.

If a GUI had a personality SourceTree would wear a tool belt and GitHub Desktop would prefer a pair of comfortable sneakers. Choose the personality that matches the task.